• SinAdjetivos@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    5 小时前
    1. It’s either a roof structure by itself or adds another ~3cm of height to an existing roof.

    2. You vastly overestimate the weight of solar panels. The ones shown probably weigh ~20kg, and probably ~35kg with framing etc. Most car roofs are rated to 30-150kg of dynamic weight. In the statistically highly improbable event where the structure completely collapsed it certainly will not “pancake” anything and will likely just be cosmetic damage.

    “somebody’s Timmy managing to shock themselves”

    No more dangerous than any of the wires that are, probably, within a few meters of you as you read this.

    1. “Harder to build and maintain” sure, but not by much and nothing requiring the full lot closures you’re imagining.

    2. “harder to angle” Sort of, there might be instances where a suboptimal angle results in better aesthetics, cheaper materials, snow clearing, etc. but we’re talking ~10-15% efficiency loss.

    Based on the shoddy logic and non-existent research I’m guessing this isn’t really about the solar panels. You wanna share what the deeper concern/peeve is?