• HrabiaVulpes@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    1 day ago

    I have explanation, but you will not like it.

    Parking lots have been built on cheap. Those who have roofs can’t support any added weight, while those who do not have roofs are far away from any serious electrical connection able to give the energy outside.

    The whole idea can be done… on new parking lots.

    Also - how about instead we build more water-plant power storage? They pump water to the upper reservoir using electricity in the middle of day, and then produce electricity from flowing water at dawn/dusk/night. This would up the demand for electricity when solar panels are overproducing it and push businesses to consider including solar panels in their constructions.

    • oatscoop@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      The benefit of pavement being cheap is it’s not terribly expensive to remove or repair bits of it. Cut a square out, drill down with an auger, chuck a sonotube in and pour a footing. Trenching in conduit for power lines doesn’t seem like much of a deal breaker either.

      I’d also image a parking lot is closer to an electrical connection than a farm field out in the country.

      • HrabiaVulpes@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        Okay, I give on the first part, but not on the second.

        Farms consume quite a lot of electricity actually, and often electrical grid must be enforced more for a farm than for a suburbs.

    • AnBee@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Pumped storage can only be feasibly used on existing suitable terrain, and we used most of the easy location.

      There is not much left, and with cheap battery storage and power to gas you can go way cheaper. Hydro power and storage is not the future.

    • Soup@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Ones on roofs are easy, a panel can’t weigh more than a car so you lose a few parking spaces on the roof level and bob’s your uncle. The goal is to reduce car usage so it’s fine. And existing ones are too far away to provide electricity? What? They’re literally beside stores which consume power! Yea I don’t like that answer, it’s dumb as hell.

      The pumping idea sounds cool, though, and I’m not against it, but dude I’m so tired of “what if we do nothing because we can’t understand the concept of having multiple solutions going at once?”