Nobody@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 6 个月前The zero-days are numbered | The Mozilla Blog - Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation [of Mythos Preview]blog.mozilla.orgexternal-linkmessage-square46fedilinkarrow-up1194cross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfirefox@fedia.io
arrow-up1194external-linkThe zero-days are numbered | The Mozilla Blog - Firefox 150 includes fixes for 271 vulnerabilities identified during this initial evaluation [of Mythos Preview]blog.mozilla.orgNobody@lemmy.world to Linux@lemmy.ml · 6 个月前message-square46fedilinkcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.worldfirefox@fedia.io
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·6 个月前Slopzilla Slopfox 🙄 This isn’t going to end well.
minus-squareAlex@lemmy.mllinkfedilinkarrow-up17·6 个月前If it’s finding valid vulnerabilities then it’s just another tool like static analysis, fuzzers and sanitizers. There definitely seems to be a difference in quality compared to earlier generations that were behind the sloppy avalanch of reports.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·6 个月前Instead of 271 vulns, it was more like 2 vulns, found 271 different times. Here’s a o good article about it https://www.flyingpenguin.com/the-boy-that-cried-mythos-verification-is-collapsing-trust-in-anthropic/
minus-squareVincent@feddit.nllinkfedilinkarrow-up2·6 个月前I don’t think these are all Mythos, but it’s more than 2 fixes: https://infosec.exchange/@tomrittervg/116443139069130293
minus-squareMentalEdge@sopuli.xyzlinkfedilinkarrow-up7·6 个月前There’s a difference between using AI to apply fixes for problems, and using AI to find problems that you didn’t know about. Mythos does the latter, not the former.
minus-squaredb2@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·6 个月前It’s only a matter of time until they decide it should do both and it makes a mess. Calling it now.
minus-squareFauxLiving@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up5·6 个月前Yes, the sky is falling, AI is ending the world, slopslopslop, etc We know the bit.
minus-squareArtVandelay@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·6 个月前Look, I’m all for fuck AI, but this isn’t that.
Slopzilla Slopfox 🙄
This isn’t going to end well.
If it’s finding valid vulnerabilities then it’s just another tool like static analysis, fuzzers and sanitizers. There definitely seems to be a difference in quality compared to earlier generations that were behind the sloppy avalanch of reports.
Instead of 271 vulns, it was more like 2 vulns, found 271 different times.
Here’s a o good article about it https://www.flyingpenguin.com/the-boy-that-cried-mythos-verification-is-collapsing-trust-in-anthropic/
I don’t think these are all Mythos, but it’s more than 2 fixes: https://infosec.exchange/@tomrittervg/116443139069130293
There’s a difference between using AI to apply fixes for problems, and using AI to find problems that you didn’t know about.
Mythos does the latter, not the former.
It’s only a matter of time until they decide it should do both and it makes a mess. Calling it now.
Yes, the sky is falling, AI is ending the world, slopslopslop, etc
We know the bit.
Look, I’m all for fuck AI, but this isn’t that.
It will be. You’ll see.