codeinabox@programming.dev to Opensource@programming.devEnglish · 5 hours agoI don't want your PRs anymoredpc.pwexternal-linkmessage-square9fedilinkarrow-up15file-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
arrow-up15external-linkI don't want your PRs anymoredpc.pwcodeinabox@programming.dev to Opensource@programming.devEnglish · 5 hours agomessage-square9fedilinkfile-textcross-posted to: technology@lemmy.world
minus-squareamio@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up15·5 hours ago“I used to have to check PRs and with LLMs I implicitly trust there’s no malicious shit in them”??? Yeah ok bro
minus-squarecoolie4@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up13·4 hours agoI mean… I think they’re right though. LLMs aren’t intentionally malicious. They’re just incompetent.
minus-squareCameronDev@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up1·2 hours ago While I still need to review LLM-generated code, I generally don’t have to worry about it being malicious the way an unknown contributor’s code could be.
“I used to have to check PRs and with LLMs I implicitly trust there’s no malicious shit in them”???
Yeah ok bro
I mean… I think they’re right though. LLMs aren’t intentionally malicious. They’re just incompetent.
End result is the same.