Being fully for or against women’s rights are absurd positions too. What, you support a woman’s right to execute people in the street? (based, but also: no, that would be horrible, terfs and white supremacist women suck).
And yet we can still say that supporting women’s rights is good and opposing women’s rights is bad. Taking “anti-AI” to mean an opposition to all artificial intelligence, from GPT to calculators, is failing to take people in good faith.
Sadly the LLMs are already roaming the streets and executing people with 50:50 chances for accuracy. From what I have seen in corporate and education in the last 12 months there is no good faith.
Being fully for or against women’s rights are absurd positions too. What, you support a woman’s right to execute people in the street? (based, but also: no, that would be horrible, terfs and white supremacist women suck).
And yet we can still say that supporting women’s rights is good and opposing women’s rights is bad. Taking “anti-AI” to mean an opposition to all artificial intelligence, from GPT to calculators, is failing to take people in good faith.
I think that’s an strawman, you are comparing a technology to human rights, it’s not exactly an apples to apples comparative.
Sadly the LLMs are already roaming the streets and executing people with 50:50 chances for accuracy. From what I have seen in corporate and education in the last 12 months there is no good faith.
I mean if she has a good reason, like the person being a terf…