• Yliaster@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    “Everyone does it!” is literally a logical fallacy.

    It’s not even just “some”, you’re minimizing the extent of control here. You cannot have a state held accountable if it systematically suppresses criticism against it.

    • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      9 hours ago

      I’m recognizing the class nature of the state and society. I’m not trying to morally justify anything, but instead point out why it exists, both necessarily and temporarily.

      • Yliaster@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 hours ago

        It does come off as you defending it when you don’t consider it bad or criticize the idea, and instead assert for it.

        We can do better. Just because everyone does it, doesn’t mean we can’t do better.

        Classes can be destroyed and we can build class-less societies without hierarchy in lieu of anarchism.

        • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Class society can only be ended through socialism, which means we need the state and all that comes with it until we achieve communism. Even in communism, hierarchy will still exist, as administration plays a necessary role in production and distribution.

          • Yliaster@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            9 hours ago

            You can’t be class-less and hierarchial at the same time, so I’m not sure how you concluded that class society can only be ended by socialism.

            Furthermore, you are conflating organization and structure with hierarchy. You do not need hierarchy for administration.

            • Cowbee [he/they]@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              6
              ·
              9 hours ago

              You absolutely can be classless while still having hierarchy. A manager is not a different class from those under them unless they have a difference in ownership of the means of production and distribution. Secondly, I am not conflating organization and structure with hierarchy, you need all 3. A nuclear power plant without hierarchy is a disaster waiting to happen. Without hierarchy, you cannot coordinate the global logistics to create a smartphone. Horizontalism has regional limitations that run counter to communism and humanity’s march towards collectivization.

        • 秦始皇帝@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          9 hours ago

          Classes can be destroyed and we can build class-less societies without hierarchy in lieu of anarchism.

          The whole point of socialism is transitioning to that stage. To get there you need to supress the reactionary classes (bourgeoisie) just like how for them to stay in power they suppress the proletariat. Then they can with time be expropriated and proletarianised until their is only one class the proletariat and class antagonisms cease to be. Pressing the magic communism worldwide class destruction 9000 button isn’t an option no matter how much you wish for it.