• zo0@programming.dev
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    19 hours ago

    They released the vulnerability without disclosing it to the vendors first? Am I understanding this right?

    • borari@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      No, they disclosed it to the Linux kernel security team, a patch was committed to mainline, then this was disclosed publicly. https://copy.fail/#timeline

      They don’t have to coordinate disclosure with every distribution vendor, but droppings public PoC exploit script 28 days after the patch was committed to mainline kind of seems like a dick move to me.

      • Semperverus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It technically follows the industry standard rules (and companies who have been exploited have 30 days to disclose breaches in the U.S. so there’s probably similar “best practice” stuff with these kinds of disclosures)

        • WhatAmLemmy@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          5 hours ago

          It’s technically still a dick move unless it’s seen in the wild and distros are dragging their heels.

          Sometimes it’s best to use logic instead of best practices.

    • poinck@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      18 hours ago

      It got me wondering as well. Normally I find out afterwards that my system is already patched since a couple of days.