based on the premise that because she was a Nazi collaborator her opinions, and those influenced by them, can and should be ignored
Mao said that I should shit when I need to. Should I now hold my shit in because Mao made crazed mistakes or was emblematic of a movement that was not exactly comfortable to those in the states and most of europe? What a stupid fucking line of reasoning.
If that is too nuanced for you to be able to determine a stance then there’s no hope for you.
Regard the reply to your first paragraph. I made it even more “nuanced”, bullshit appeal anyway.
I never said that I agreed or disagreed. How you read any disagreement or agreement into my statement is beyond me and whether or not I agree is not at all a relevant point that needs to be brought up. The author’s position is “pretty clear” because the comic is posted in liberal spaces where virtually everyone dislikes Hitler. Social context makes it obvious, but it’s not at all strictly obvious from the logic of the joke and hinges mostly on how “you look great” is interpreted. I point that out and people lose their shit because they interpret messages anywhich way they feel is comfortable and when they’re not able to categorise a statement, potentially because it is rather neutral but contains structured statements in regards to the content of the post, it just makes it seem hostile to them when it’s not in its content.
Damn. Here I was taking you seriously and you go and drop the suggestion that disliking Hitler is an uncertain foundation for discussion and social context.
hahahaha you’re a Stalinist. Gee, that is embarrassing. But not at all surprising seeing how this dude got all giddy when there were small to medium sized businesses in the Soviet Union. Man loved the social market economy and hated socialism
Mao said that I should shit when I need to. Should I now hold my shit in because Mao made crazed mistakes or was emblematic of a movement that was not exactly comfortable to those in the states and most of europe? What a stupid fucking line of reasoning.
Regard the reply to your first paragraph. I made it even more “nuanced”, bullshit appeal anyway.
Whether or not you agree with it has nothing to do with the fact that the author’s position is pretty clear.
I never said that I agreed or disagreed. How you read any disagreement or agreement into my statement is beyond me and whether or not I agree is not at all a relevant point that needs to be brought up. The author’s position is “pretty clear” because the comic is posted in liberal spaces where virtually everyone dislikes Hitler. Social context makes it obvious, but it’s not at all strictly obvious from the logic of the joke and hinges mostly on how “you look great” is interpreted. I point that out and people lose their shit because they interpret messages anywhich way they feel is comfortable and when they’re not able to categorise a statement, potentially because it is rather neutral but contains structured statements in regards to the content of the post, it just makes it seem hostile to them when it’s not in its content.
Damn. Here I was taking you seriously and you go and drop the suggestion that disliking Hitler is an uncertain foundation for discussion and social context.
Have a good one.
You not been on instagram the last year? Or to Bulgaria?
Dropping this here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Social-desirability_bias Lemmy apparently ain’t committing to earnest engagement over dogpiling lmao
Straight to the classism aha
“Telling me to get a job is classist, telling me to touch grass is ableist”
hahahaha you’re a Stalinist. Gee, that is embarrassing. But not at all surprising seeing how this dude got all giddy when there were small to medium sized businesses in the Soviet Union. Man loved the social market economy and hated socialism