As Canada prepares to accept more Chinese-made electric vehicles into the country, a U.S. senator is warning that although Canada-U.S. ties are strained, Canadian officials should be cautious when making agreements with China’s government.

“I understand that Canada is looking elsewhere and trying to diversify,” Michigan Democratic Sen. Elissa Slotkin said.

“Jjust because we [the U.S.] have become more difficult doesn’t mean the Chinese are always the straightest shooters when it comes to national security,” Slotkin [said].

The Michigan senator, also a former CIA officer, explained her concerns with a Chinese-made EV sending back 3D video and geolocation data, which could be “hacked back to Beijing.”

“They’re national security issues, not just economic security issues,” Slotkin said. She and a Republican senator from Ohio have also introduced a bill banning the import, sale and operation of vehicles manufactured in China.

Slotkin’s security concerns echo those made by other Canadian officials — including Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre and Ontario Premier Doug Ford — and some Canadian experts.

Over the last decade, China has passed a series of national security and intelligence laws that oblige Chinese companies to co-operate with the government when asked. A similar law in the U.S., called the Cloud Act, compels American technology companies to share data gathered in foreign countries with the government if asked.

    • Scotty@scribe.disroot.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      14 hours ago

      Oh, yeah, we do know where we stand. The Chinese envoy to Canada has already ‘warned’ Canada to send MPs to Taiwan, just to name an example. The coercion and bullying has already begun. China is a dictatorship and doesn’t care about agreements. It’s at least as unreliable as the U.S.

      • ☆ Yσɠƚԋσʂ ☆@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        11 hours ago

        Ah yes, China not wanting Canada to interfere in their internal affairs is coercion now. It’s like saying it would be coercion if China started funding and arming a separatist movement in Quebec and Canada warned against that.

      • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        13 hours ago

        Would you accept the US sending members of congress to meet with Danielle Smith and encourage Alberta separatists?

          • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            7 hours ago

            The US definitely is! Maybe not sending members of Congress as far as I know, but fully supporting separatists. That’s why I asked OP if they accept it, since they seem to be up in arms about China pulling a stink about Canada doing the same with Taiwan.

      • Marty200@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        13 hours ago

        We’ve gotten those warnings before. The question is do they stick to their trade deals when we disagree on foreign policy.

        • Scotty@scribe.disroot.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The question is do they stick to their trade deals when we disagree on foreign policy.

          No, they don’t. As seen literally everywhere in the world.

              • grey_maniac@lemmy.ca
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                6
                ·
                11 hours ago

                Thank you? This is the first time I’ve been called a troll. The US is infamous for economic coercion throughout the world, from even before the days of economic hitmen continuing into the present. Even moreso than China. I take it you didn’t mean the US, and that is why you reacted the way you have.