• teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    22 hours ago

    Trying to understand where you might be going with this. Is the implication that non-deterministic/stochastic algorithms have no practical use in engineering?

    • littleomid@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      18 hours ago

      No, they have a place where stochastic algorithms are necessary. For writing a hello world application, no stochastic algorithm is necessary. Comparing compilers with LLMs is comparing apples with oranges.

      • teawrecks@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I think it will become more apparent over time. But consider that the practice of software engineering is a stochastic process. Give 10 different engineers the same goal, and you’ll get 10 different solutions.

        • littleomid@feddit.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          8 hours ago

          At that rate me walking to the store is stochastic because a grand piano could fall on my head. We have to draw the line at some logical point.

        • aldhissla@piefed.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          8 hours ago

          If a SW dev applicant gives a 20-file generated output for a 20-line assessment problem and can’t explain single lines of “their” code, either what they should be doing or why “they” had written it, it’s gonna be a no from me, dawg. A standard problem might have different solutions, but fixing the issue of the day to the satisfaction of a rabidly vocal customer base might have one at most, and it will change multiple times on a whim.

          So the LLM might have helped them cheat their way to an MSc, but there’s no cheating your way through real life.