cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1144611/google-disregard-right-now-if-you-want-to-see-where-ai-overviews-fall-short-similar-comm
For comparison, Bing and Kagi responses
Sources
cross-posted from: https://piefed.world/c/tech/p/1144611/google-disregard-right-now-if-you-want-to-see-where-ai-overviews-fall-short-similar-comm
For comparison, Bing and Kagi responses
Sources
FYI when I tried Kagi’s Quick Answer out of curiosity, even that gave me a dictionary definition for “disregard”. That being the case, I’d trust it about as much as I trust Google’s AI overviews (which is to mean “not at all”). It just doesn’t show up for me unless I prompt it.
FWIW just searching Kagi (the way someone searched Google here) yields a dictionary definition “provided by WordsAPI”. So it’s actually
You can’t say any of those things about AI.
Normally, yes. That always seems to be one of the results.
I specifically forced it to do a quick answer, and it still gave me a definition. Interestingly, for “disregard”, it also covered a bit about the Google nonsense results after defining the word.