• ruuster13@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    20 hours ago

    Canonical has no choice but to be “in the thick of” AI and agents if open source is to have any say in how these systems evolve.

    The more the left denies this, the more it sounds like the right by clinging to outdated beliefs.

        • axh@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          20
          ·
          18 hours ago

          Left, right, left… Are you commenting on AI or crossing the street?

        • Skyline969@piefed.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          19
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Probably. I’m not right wing though. I’m just sick of people dragging politics into things that don’t need it. There are dozens of political communities. Talk politics there.

            • Skyline969@piefed.ca
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              23
              ·
              19 hours ago

              Left, right, doesn’t matter. Billionaires are the problem. This technology wouldn’t get off the ground without billionaires.

        • TheFogan@programming.dev
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          11
          ·
          19 hours ago

          Perhaps they do… but that doesn’t change it here. AI isn’t really a left vs right thing though, It’s a solution in search of problems. Constantly pointed out that it can’t scale, and so far most of what it does is… match humans, at a higher cost… and it’s price is increasing rather than decreasing

    • Babalugats@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      18 hours ago

      Sooo… the right are the bad guys in that scenario? And the left are becoming the bad guys by not agreeing with that?

      I mean… What’s your point?