Seems like he’s been pushed into using LLMs as a way to cope with the deluge of LLM-generated security reports.

  • binux@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Well rsync is a pretty integral utility for a whole array of software at this point, and I guarantee you that not all of its userbase has the expertise required for direct contributions. I don’t think it’s fair to write off the complaints of people like that as irrelevant, especially if they have a stake in rsync working well for them without having to worry about AI hallucinations screwing them over.

    • Phoenixz@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well yes but.

      This guy is already retired, he wants to spend his days sailing and here we are bitching about rsync not being good enough while we all use if for free

      Most of us won’t be able to help code

      But most of us could help with translations

      Many of us could help with documentation

      Some of us could contribute regularly nwith small financial donations

      Some of us might have enough knowledge and expertise and experience to help code

      The point is: rsync need more resources. Either we get him more resources or we STFU about the retired dev using AI. We can’t have it both ways

    • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      10 hours ago

      I agree with the worry and wanting an alternative but demanding what the dev does is where it crosses a line I feel

      • binux@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        I agree with that too, though I think the self-righteous attitude like that of the person I’m replying to swings in the opposite direction a little too hard for my liking. There’s a happy balance, y’know?

        People shouldn’t complain in a dev’s ear like they owe them something they never promised, and people trying to call that out shouldn’t counter it with a demeaningly confrontational demeanour. Obviously that’s a lot to ask for on the internet, but it’s a good thing to try for at least.

        • slacktoid@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          47 minutes ago

          Tell me about it, I am skeptical about AI and I kinda wanna know the True Positive, true negative, false positive, false negatives with these AI classified bugs. Still a useful tool.

          I just think it’s unreasonable to ask someone to do dev work for free, either pay or contribute (code, docs, help in misc ways) or cash (and pull out when they do something you don’t approve that’s your right). But until there’s real fuckery let’s just open bug reports and complain about real issues that can be fixed.

    • onlinepersona@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      edit-2
      10 hours ago

      It’s provided as is, no warranty, no guarantee. If you built your life around it, that’s on you, not the dev. If you want something else, do it yourself or pay somebody to do it for you.

      • binux@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        10 hours ago

        Fair, but a little empathy for rsync users who only mean well would go a long way. The everyone-for-themselves mentality doesn’t tend to be very helpful most of the time, if ever.