themachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 hours agoValve antitrust lawsuit reportedly reveals lengths Steam owner is willing to go to prevent cheaper prices elsewherewww.eurogamer.netexternal-linkmessage-square26fedilinkarrow-up160
arrow-up160external-linkValve antitrust lawsuit reportedly reveals lengths Steam owner is willing to go to prevent cheaper prices elsewherewww.eurogamer.netthemachinestops@lemmy.dbzer0.com to Technology@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 hours agomessage-square26fedilink
minus-squareTJA!@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up4·2 hours agoBut steam is taking an additional 30% for themselves. So the customer is always paying that premium.
minus-squarelime!@feddit.nulinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up7·edit-21 hour agoif prices are the same, then the publisher is the one paying the premium.
minus-squareTJA!@sh.itjust.workslinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·16 minutes agoNot of the publisher is just pricing it 30% higher. Remember: they wanted to sell it for a lower price on their own stores and valve was against that. So now the consumer has to pay more everywhere
minus-squareCosmoNova@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up3·2 hours agoYup. It would simply be more fair if this rule would be applied after distributors took their cut. Let devs make their games cheaper when platforms ask for a smaller share. That‘d only be reasonable.
But steam is taking an additional 30% for themselves. So the customer is always paying that premium.
if prices are the same, then the publisher is the one paying the premium.
Not of the publisher is just pricing it 30% higher. Remember: they wanted to sell it for a lower price on their own stores and valve was against that.
So now the consumer has to pay more everywhere
Yup. It would simply be more fair if this rule would be applied after distributors took their cut. Let devs make their games cheaper when platforms ask for a smaller share. That‘d only be reasonable.