Hey all, until now I’m being super reluctant about using any AI tool. On top of all the privacy issues it obviously comes with it (I can’t believe there are people talking to ChatGpt and literally teaching them how to impersonated!), I have a feeling that it only does jobs that you are capable of doing with other tools, but since it looks like a person and not a computer, people start to fantasize that it will do everything they don’t know or don’t want to do it and become numb and stupid. But, maybe there are some uses for it and at my office we will soon have access to Claude, so I want to explore it and check for myself. My question is what precautions should I take and what limits should I put on my usage? I thought about creating a new email account just for signing up, but obviously that’s nothing nowadays.

  • Jul (they/she)@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    6 minutes ago

    LLMs have uses, some of them are even quite intriguing. But they have to be properly trained. You can’t just throw the whole internet at a baby with very little other training and expect them to not be corrupted by random wrong information. Same goes for LLMs though on a much larger scale. Also, they are often configured to give an answer even when the confidence in it being correct is relatively low. Something an expert would never do, they’d consult only specialized information, not just review the top search results on Google. This is one reason why they “hallucinate”. Commercially trained models just aren’t all that useful as a source of information or to correctly complete tasks. And additionally there are extreme ethical concerns about how it gets the information it’s trained on including using hacking botnets to impersonate a human among other things. A person who’s an expert has to review everything in excruciating detail and so most of the time it’s just more cost effective to just consult an expert in the first place. It’s like going to a proverbial used car car salesman and asking how cars work. Sure they might have picked up a fair amount of information from being around mechanics, but some of it is wrong and what they don’t know they’ll just make something up that sounds mostly plausible.

  • SteakSneak@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    3 hours ago

    Run your own. Doesn’t require internet connection. Try downloading a model like gemma 4 and run it on android with pocket pal

  • RheumatoidArthritis@mander.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    4 hours ago

    You can redact sensitive data before sending it, there are tools for that, i know one named privatiser.

    Best to not create an account if you don’t have to, ppq.ai and NanoGPT are proxy services that claim to protect your privacy. Or use the free tier of big services with a vpn and the usual privacy tools.

    Other than that, explore, enjoy and don’t tell it anything you wouldn’t tell a policeman. Ask it about a bird you have seen recently, or a phrase in a foreign language that has always confused you. They’re good in things that are hard to search the normal way.

  • guymontag@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    6 hours ago

    If you want real good intelligence (self host ain’t cutting it for most things), then use an ai anonymizer like duck.ai or lumo(haven’t tried this one so idk). You can also use chatgpt.com with TOR. I would just keep in mind no matter what your prompt are being trained on, so don’t provide identifiable info.

  • FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Unless you’re running a model on an air gapped machine that will never connect to the internet again, there is no privacy preserving way to use so-called AI today. All the providers will tell you it’s no problem. But then you read the news about which model fucked up what today. And it’s a lot. Anybody using so-called AI today is voluntarily participating in a massive, not well organized beta test. At their own jeopardy.

    So don’t give it your medical history and don’t talk to it about your innermost thoughts. Try to keep it out of your internet browser and history if you can.

  • Rat_in_a_hat@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    10 hours ago

    What’s your threat model and what do you want the AI to do?

    Does it need an internet connection? Do you have to use a service rather than the dataset/model? Do you have a machine powerful enough to run it locally? Is it for work or personal use? Why do you have to create an account to use your work’s Claude subscription?

  • Luminous5481 "Enemy of the State"@anarchist.nexus
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    10 hours ago

    for starters, don’t use Claude Opus to do any real work. Opus is good for planning, but once it has a plan, switch to a cheaper model like Sonnet to do the actual work. using Opus for everything is how people burn through all their tokens in a day.

  • dieTasse@feddit.org
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    9 hours ago

    Try Lumo from proton if you want to stay private. I was (am) reluctant too, but i found out it can be useful if I am writing something more official, NOT to let it do it for me, but the sentences I am not sure about, it can tell me if they are fine and explain why (and you can verify with easy search because you know now what you are looking for). It’s especially helpful with my non native languages. Otherwise i did not yet find any other useful use case and I refuse to use it for dev.