can@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agoknow it rule nephewsh.itjust.worksimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1105
arrow-up1105imageknow it rule nephewsh.itjust.workscan@sh.itjust.works to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 10 days agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-squarecan@sh.itjust.worksOPlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·7 days agoI don’t think they meant “use” with any negative connotation. I’m curious. Had they said “utilized” instead would that have read better to you?
minus-squaremisery mansion@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·7 days agoFrom a purely grammatical perspective, yes, utilized would be a little bit less pejorative than used. But I still think Roger Taylor would object hehe
I don’t think they meant “use” with any negative connotation. I’m curious. Had they said “utilized” instead would that have read better to you?
From a purely grammatical perspective, yes, utilized would be a little bit less pejorative than used. But I still think Roger Taylor would object hehe