• Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    24
    ·
    4 hours ago

    As someone pointed out, this is understandable if you’re from the USA.

    Otherwise, I see it like this:

    • Every country has an army.

    • Their own, or the one of another country.

    The baseline is that going to war is bad, having a defensive army is absolutely not (and will prevent deaths as russia won’t dare attack you).

    • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      Having a formidable army has clearly not deterred global superpowers from attacking you, especially if they get too cocky like in Iran and Ukraine

      • Valmond@lemmy.dbzer0.com
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Neither Ukraine nor Iran had a “formidable” army when they were attacked.

        Russia was supposedly the second army in the world too.

        • TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneOPM
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          26 minutes ago

          Iran has long possessed the ability to survive decapitation and respond to an existential threat by closing the strait. It’s why no US President tried it before now. Ukraine was more of a surprise than Iran, but Russia not realizing that their own neighbor wouldn’t be a pushover the second time was still a danger that they could’ve foreseen. In both cases, deterrence didn’t work because the invaders were greedy and irrationally confident.

        • Deacon@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          3 hours ago

          I have a standing subjugation appointment with my neighbor every Thursday in fact. Don’t knock it til you try it.