You clearly know literally nothing … The fact you even suggested it in the first place shows you lack even a bare minimum understanding
You’ve written so much abuse, without explaining a darn thing.
whatever spaghetti-at-the-wall trash you’re doing
Yeah, an anonymous internet message board is a pretty irresponsible place to throw spaghetti at the wall, I guess. Seeing as how the entire APA board is refreshing this very thread feverishly. I guess I better find a mop, huh?
You cherrypicked “sensationalized”, somehow offered something more sensationalized anyway,
No no, I did it the other way around. I started with the spaghetti-at-the-wall trash, and then I discovered the resources you so kindly provided supported my point pretty much exactly.
“Let’s make the terminology somehow much worse. And I’m going to abuse what you provided showing that my suggestions were pointing in the wrong direction to claim that, actually, psychologists totally agree with me – because we both want change, see?”
You can say there should be change. What you can’t do is come up with stupid-as-fuck alternatives and then hide behind actual experts and claim they’re saying basically the same thing (edit: but of course only the parts you personally like; throw everything else in the trash). You can’t say the soup lacks flavor, suggest putting in antifreeze, and then say you were basically on the right track because a chef said the soup lacks flavor and suggested adding jalapeño.
You’ve written so much abuse, without explaining a darn thing.
Yeah, an anonymous internet message board is a pretty irresponsible place to throw spaghetti at the wall, I guess. Seeing as how the entire APA board is refreshing this very thread feverishly. I guess I better find a mop, huh?
No no, I did it the other way around. I started with the spaghetti-at-the-wall trash, and then I discovered the resources you so kindly provided supported my point pretty much exactly.
“Let’s make the terminology somehow much worse. And I’m going to abuse what you provided showing that my suggestions were pointing in the wrong direction to claim that, actually, psychologists totally agree with me – because we both want change, see?”
You can say there should be change. What you can’t do is come up with stupid-as-fuck alternatives and then hide behind actual experts and claim they’re saying basically the same thing (edit: but of course only the parts you personally like; throw everything else in the trash). You can’t say the soup lacks flavor, suggest putting in antifreeze, and then say you were basically on the right track because a chef said the soup lacks flavor and suggested adding jalapeño.