• als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      They were grouping together to all raise prices at once. If everyone who sold food suddenly raised their costs together, would it be fair? There’d be consumers to buy it. Basic economics!

      Just because people would pay more for something, doesn’t mean they should have to

      • garbage_world@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        19 hours ago

        We don’t know, but we have another explanation: consumers went to buy from all three memory manufacturers at once, offering the same, high price.

        • als@lemmy.blahaj.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          19 hours ago

          The problem lies in 3 companies owning a monopoly on dram production and all conspiring together to make things shit for everyone who isn’t them

            • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              13 hours ago

              They very much can when they’ve been proven to collude to keep prices up.

              If any one of them started making more RAM, they’d make a lot more profit than the other two. If all 3 did, they’d all still make a bunch of profit, but not as much as right now. They have an agreement that nobody ramps up RAM production so everyone gets to keep super high margins.

              In the past they’ve literally agreed upon a target price to keep…

          • garbage_world@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            2
            ·
            19 hours ago

            The problem is the fact demand is higher than supply, which memory manufacturers are trying to solve.

            If they’re competing with each other, which they are, it’s not a monopoly.