It can never be the same as our need to celebrate heterosexuality. Because heterosexuals have never been, murdered, correctively raped, attacked, imprisoned and discriminated against for their sexuality. It will never not be important to remember this, even if we achieve a society that no longer reproduces those things.
You do understand that’s logically “keep looking differently towards a certain kind of people because murderous aggressors who looked differently towards them did horrible things to them because of it”?!
You’re literally justifying the continuation of a discriminatory perspective towards people with minority sexual orientations by using the actions of the aggressors had and acted on said discriminatory perspective.
At best that’s circular logic, or maybe Stockholm Syndrome (since you’ve accepted the perspective of the aggressor even if you disapprove of their actions)
You’re making my point on why the “it’s all normal” perspective of the Dutch is so refreshing compared to the perspective of Anglo-Saxon countries.
What the fuck are you talking about? How am I making an argument for different treatment by wanting to continue to celebrate queer folks.
How am I justifying discrimination? How?
Edit: I briefly looked through your comment history and you have seem to have decent enough politics. So maybe we are less at odds than it seems. That being said I think your take above is dogshit.
It can never be the same as our need to celebrate heterosexuality. Because heterosexuals have never been, murdered, correctively raped, attacked, imprisoned and discriminated against for their sexuality. It will never not be important to remember this, even if we achieve a society that no longer reproduces those things.
You do understand that’s logically “keep looking differently towards a certain kind of people because murderous aggressors who looked differently towards them did horrible things to them because of it”?!
You’re literally justifying the continuation of a discriminatory perspective towards people with minority sexual orientations by using the actions of the aggressors had and acted on said discriminatory perspective.
At best that’s circular logic, or maybe Stockholm Syndrome (since you’ve accepted the perspective of the aggressor even if you disapprove of their actions)
You’re making my point on why the “it’s all normal” perspective of the Dutch is so refreshing compared to the perspective of Anglo-Saxon countries.
What the fuck are you talking about? How am I making an argument for different treatment by wanting to continue to celebrate queer folks.
How am I justifying discrimination? How?
Edit: I briefly looked through your comment history and you have seem to have decent enough politics. So maybe we are less at odds than it seems. That being said I think your take above is dogshit.