• AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    4 小時前

    Have you ever been checked for Oppositional Defiance Disorder? Because as someone who has it, you just described it to a T.

    • Bytemeister@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      42 分鐘前

      That’s not oppositional defiance disorder.

      Oppositional Defiance Disorder was when republicans ran campaigns against vaccines simply because Democrats supported making vaccines affordable and available to everyone.

      Republicans literally blamed their outsized deaths and disabilities from COVID on Democrats pushing people so hard to get their shots.

      Asking why, and refusing to do something because it lacks a logical precedent is not oppositional defiance, it’s basic awareness and attention to your surroundings.

    • root@lemmy.wtf
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      3 小時前

      Why is psychology this way?

      the coolest thing ever is

      The BAD EVIL Disorder

      in psychology language

      everything has to be a “disorder”

      • AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        3 小時前

        They name the conditions by how they affect normal people, not how the conditions affect us.

        Admittedly, I literally told off a priest and a cop at completely different times in the same day, when I was 5…

        • voodooattack@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          7 分鐘前

          Nobody bothers observing what the difference between insanity and madness is.

          Insane: an observation you make about another, subjective, they clearly have a self-consistent reasoning process with a metric that you don’t share. But communication and cooperation is still possible. Aka Neurodivergent

          Mad: illogical, goes against established and observable evidence, may harm self or others, aka nut case