• fonix232@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    22
    ·
    1 day ago

    I mean yeah, to some extent you’re right.

    But it is also due to telemetrics being helpful in diagnosing issues before users even report them, measuring their business effects, or even doing A/B tests to see how a new feature may affect the user experience.

    Problem is that companies realised this info can also be used for other purposes - such as, datamining the users - to create another lucrative revenue source…

    • kayazere@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      1 day ago

      A/B testing without consent is unethical. This doesn’t fly in any scientific fields, yet the technology industry doesn’t think twice about experimenting on users without consent.

      • fonix232@fedia.io
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        14 hours ago

        What a load of bollocks.

        Nobody owes you anything, especially if it’s a free service. And A/B testing is pretty much the only way to get reliable results on how a feature may shape user experience.

        Or would you rather companies just delivered features without any care how it affects users?

      • if_you_can_keep_it@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        15 hours ago

        I think it’s a bit of a stretch to consider A/B testing under the same umbrella as subjecting somebody to a scientific study. A/B testing can be selling different products in different stores or trying different pricing strategies. There are certainly shady things you can do with A/B testing, like trying out dark patterns, but require consumers give consent for any kind of market experimentation?