• KubeRoot@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I believe that’s what they’re saying, that if released software has any bugs that users encounter, and the developers want to know about them to fix them, they’re “outsourcing QA” to the users.

    So yeah, good luck creating software and updates with literally no issues :P

    • NecroticEuphoria@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      21 hours ago

      QA happens before release. Of course that doesn’t prevent some bugs from slipping through, but instead of waiting for the user to break stuff, I broke it on purpose, working in QA.

      I seriously don’t trust any telemetry. Maybe my “paranoia” or whatever makes me heavily biased.

      • phutatorius@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        edit-2
        24 minutes ago

        Telemetry tends to be put in reactively after something broke. Barn door, horse bolted, etc. Also, even when it’s done proactively, devs often often aren’t aware of what’s relevant and actionable in a support context.