pedrobear@altgag.net to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agoRomanes eunt domusaltgag.netimagemessage-square29fedilinkarrow-up1400
arrow-up1400imageRomanes eunt domusaltgag.netpedrobear@altgag.net to memes@lemmy.world · 1 day agomessage-square29fedilink
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up24·1 day agoHow often did the hoplite style shield result in an arrow to the shin or knee?
minus-squareAvicenna@programming.devlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·13 hours agoAsk that guy who took an arrow to the knee and left the legion
minus-square[object Object]@lemmy.calinkfedilinkarrow-up44·1 day agoI don’t think the Roman’s or Greeks had B 17 bombers
minus-squareAceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.comlinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up5·edit-211 hours agoOf course not: it makes sense that Bomber numbers were much lower in Ancient times. Also the Romans would’ve used roman numerals. So Roman bombers would probably be B II, B III, maybe even B IV
minus-squareBatman@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up16·1 day agomaybe they were all shot down due to sampling bias? would have been B XVII .
minus-squareNoneOfUrBusiness@fedia.iolinkfedilinkarrow-up3·1 day agoEhem ehem @PugJesus@piefed.social
How often did the hoplite style shield result in an arrow to the shin or knee?
Ask that guy who took an arrow to the knee and left the legion
I don’t think the Roman’s or Greeks had B 17 bombers
Of course not: it makes sense that Bomber numbers were much lower in Ancient times. Also the Romans would’ve used roman numerals.
So Roman bombers would probably be B II, B III, maybe even B IV
Do you have a source on that?
No
maybe they were all shot down due to sampling bias? would have been B XVII .
Ehem ehem @PugJesus@piefed.social