UnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 12 hours agoRule Breakerpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square39fedilinkarrow-up1339
arrow-up1339imageRule Breakerpiefed.cdn.blahaj.zoneUnixSlvt42@piefed.blahaj.zone to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 12 hours agomessage-square39fedilink
minus-squarer1veRRR@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoNever ever have I seen it used in that manner. It’s always used as a thought terminating cliche suggesting that any comparison requires two things to be equal.
minus-squareandho@lemmy.ziplinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up1·2 hours agoThat’s the implication, but saying it doesn’t make it true. It’s up to you to decide if it’s a valid point.
Never ever have I seen it used in that manner. It’s always used as a thought terminating cliche suggesting that any comparison requires two things to be equal.
That’s the implication, but saying it doesn’t make it true. It’s up to you to decide if it’s a valid point.