• CorrectAlias@piefed.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    In case you don’t know what 1.0 does:

    What is it?

    A temporary derogation from the ePrivacy Directive that allowed (but did not require) providers to scan private messages of unsuspected users for potential child sexual abuse material.

    Is scanning mandatory?

    No — voluntary. In practice used mainly by unencrypted US services such as Gmail, Facebook/Instagram Messenger, Skype, Snapchat, iCloud Mail, and Xbox.

    Does it touch encrypted messages?

    No. End-to-end encrypted communications were never scanned but providers could deploy client-side scanning under this law.

    Status today

    Back in force. After expiring on 4 April 2026, it was reinstated on 9 July 2026 when Parliament failed to reach the absolute majority of 361 MEPs needed to reject the Council’s fast-tracked “new” law. Only 314 MEPs voted to reject it, so suspicionless mass scanning is permitted to continue until 2028.

    https://fightchatcontrol.eu/chat-control-overview

    • Axolotl@feddit.it
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      edit-2
      11 hours ago

      AKA: it does in fact impact E2EE because it allow a thirdy party to read the messages in plain text which E2EE does not like

    • tuxiqae@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      36 minutes ago

      It’s so outdated that it’s talking specifically about Skype even though it hasn’t been a thing for a couple of years now

    • abc@suppo.fi
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      edit-2
      12 hours ago

      Also important to note I think is that Chat Control 1.0 was enacted in July 2021. It was meant to be a temporary stop-gap solution until CSAR aka Chat Control 2.0 would be negotiated as a more permanent solution. 1.0 already got extended in 2024 to April 2026 when CSAR wasn’t progressing.

      So they just reinstated the temporary solution that has already been there for 5 years.

      • Mikina@programming.dev
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        9 hours ago

        This is important. Basically, nothing changes. The parties that wanted to (Meta, Google, Microsoft) have already been doing it for the last 5 years.

        I’m not defending it, I’ve been screaming about it every time 2.0 was discussed, especially with people who I know refuse to move away from M$ and Meta, but apparently they don’t care that much.

        I just hope they will settle on 1.0 passing and fuck off with it being mandatory, so I have at least some place to chat and keep my data.