OriginEnergySux@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 hours agoIt's the spelling for melemmy.worldimagemessage-square78fedilinkarrow-up1373
arrow-up1373imageIt's the spelling for melemmy.worldOriginEnergySux@lemmy.world to Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world · 18 hours agomessage-square78fedilink
minus-squaregedaliyah@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up26·15 hours agoIncest is almost never between two consenting adults. There is almost always an inappropriate power dynamic, coercion, and/or grooming.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up21·15 hours agoI don’t think we have enough data to make that assumption.
minus-squarecosmos8188@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkarrow-up7·12 hours agoThat is correct, and that is why we shouldn’t make any wild assumptions which dont hold up to the facts. This is essentially shooting blindly within the smoke - there are better ways than relying on assumptions or the “feel”.
minus-squareSethW@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up10·15 hours agoBut then the problem is the grooming not the incest so grooming should be the taboo
minus-squareHonytawk@discuss.tchncs.delinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up2·11 hours agoSo in the cases where it is not, you’d allow incest?
Incest is almost never between two consenting adults. There is almost always an inappropriate power dynamic, coercion, and/or grooming.
I don’t think we have enough data to make that assumption.
No, it’s pretty well studied.
That is correct, and that is why we shouldn’t make any wild assumptions which dont hold up to the facts. This is essentially shooting blindly within the smoke - there are better ways than relying on assumptions or the “feel”.
I think we do.
But then the problem is the grooming not the incest so grooming should be the taboo
Both can be Taboo, and should be.
So in the cases where it is not, you’d allow incest?