• lime!@feddit.nu
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    12 hours ago

    i don’t think this is normalising, is it? if anything the tone of the tweet almost makes it feel like they’re offended that the two things are being compared.

      • lime!@feddit.nu
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        8
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        not that i really want to continue the discussion (we agree that SA is bad and the people doing it should be put in prison) but isn’t this a bit like saying furry porn is pretty much the same as bestiality?

        • Zarobi@aussie.zone
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          9 hours ago

          No, it’s like saying drawn porn between a human and animal is the same as bestiality, which it is. A cartoon sheep is still a sheep.

          Furries are basically alternate humanoids like elves. With your logic every time someone fucks with cat ears on then it’s a crime, nya.

          • lime!@feddit.nu
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            5
            ·
            8 hours ago

            i mean… i’ve seen that kinda porn on furry sites. there’s a whole subgenre. usually the animals can talk, but they’re still animals. as in, not anthropomorphic.

            • Zarobi@aussie.zone
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              3 hours ago

              I get the angle you’re going for: if Beast Boy from Teen Titans turns into an actual horse and fucks Raven, is it bestiality? The answer is, we have no precedent in law or morality for intelligent animals above the age of consent engaging in inter-species intercourse, so the response will depend on who you’re asking. That’s clearly not what I was referring to, though, and it feels like this is turning into whataboutism.