• PlasmaSnake@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago
    1. This means that if we find a cure for contagious diseases then fucking dead animals becomes okay
    2. “Shared moral framework” sounds like a fancy word with no actual logical backing behind it
    3. How do we decide which deviant behaviour is acceptable and which is unacceptable
    • surewhynotlem@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      This means that if we find a cure for contagious diseases then fucking dead animals becomes okay

      Yes. It’s ok. It says a LOT about the person doing it though.

      Just like you CAN stand on the street corner and shout about flat earth and aliens. But it says a lot about you and we judge you for it.

      And let’s be real. If you’re okay with intentionally killing a cow to then cut it up, jam it in your face hole and swallow, how can you be against accidentally killing a deer and not cutting it up, and using its hole instead. Let’s be consistent folks.

    • petrol_sniff_king@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      8 hours ago

      2, The shared moral framework is how we know that it’s rude to pop an airphone in and start playing a youtube video while someone is talking to you.

      3, I’ll be the only one deciding if you refuse to participate.

      • TheLeadenSea@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        8 hours ago

        Could you decide that having sex with the same gender, or with a different race, is wrong then if it’s just whatever you, or mainstream society, thinks? Those things were definitely condemned by the mainstream once, but there’s actually nothing wrong with them.