Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

  • sem@piefed.blahaj.zoneEnglish
    1·
    1 day ago

    As a lay person, codecs and containers are not visible to me, but the file extension is.

    So .webm would be relevant in a post about .webp, because they are only one letter different.

    • Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish
      1·
      1 day ago

      What are we even talking about?

      fork:

      • implied that webp doesn’t support transparency (false);
      • got called out;
      • brought up the topic of video containers (incorrectly) for some reason;
      • got called out again.

      The fact that webm is relevant here is undisputed (or so I believe)