• BurgerBaron@quokk.au
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    2 days ago

    If we stopped cold turkey today I was under the impression it’s gonna get even worse anyways from lag time of the consequences of what we’ve already polluted. Smoke for the rest of my summer days, correct me if I’m wrong.

    • notabot@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      1 day ago

      It would be a bit like stopping smoking. We’d see some improvements almost straight away, as someone mentioned, look back at the covid lockdowns, but there would also be slower responding, longer term, benefits. The sooner we start, the sooner we get there, and you might not have smoky summers for the rest of your days.

    • Tyrq@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yes, it’s a sunk cost, we may as well just keep destroying the habitabilty of the planet since we’ve come this far, we ain’t no quitters.

      • BurgerBaron@quokk.au
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        13
        ·
        2 days ago

        We don’t stop till it’s Venus lads, roll coal! launches 4 bazillion satellites who needs O Zone either, let’s GOOOO

    • NarrativeBear@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      27
      ·
      2 days ago

      When COVID hit and everyone did the stay at home thing we felt the effects almost instantly. Waterways cleared up and air quality improved significantly.

      • yeehaw@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        2 days ago

        I remember this but I also don’t know if/how it will affect heat wave and ice caps.

        • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          1 day ago

          but I also don’t know if/how it will affect heat wave and ice caps.

          Yes, there will be a lag to see those impacts improve. Years long. Probably multiple decades.

          But that’s always going to be the case. And the longger the damage is allowed to compound, the longer it will take for the system to recover once we eventually stop fucking it up.

    • CaptDust@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      edit-2
      2 days ago

      If we stopped burning oil today, entirely, worldwide, the environment should stabilize around temperatures in about 10 years. That’d be a start. That figure also assumes the arctic permafrost hasn’t thawed far enough to keep pushing temps itself.

      But yes I’ve read timelines of 100+ years to see real improvement.

      • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        2 days ago

        That figure also assumes the arctic permafrost hasn’t thawed far enough to keep pushing temps itself.

        That figure would be making a very incorrect assumption.

        Wait until summer 2027, then no one will be able to deny this.

    • HumanOnEarth@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      17
      ·
      2 days ago

      Wish you were wrong.

      It’s depressing how few people know that. Like you think it’s bad, it’s going to get worse your whole life even if we stop everything today, now.

      I think it’s maybe too scary of a verified truth for many people to even register. Like most people’s brains are protecting them by blocking them from understanding it.