• dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      5 hours ago

      No, they actually have fewer total accidents per mile than actual taxi drivers. Did you read the link you posted? They are involved in 1.5 times more accidents with severe or fatal injuries per mile, but that is comparing Waymos driving in more open cities at higher speeds to taxis in the very slow speed, high traffic city of NYC where the primary use case is different. Also, the only fatal accidents (2 of them) have been the fault of other cars, not Waymos, so it’s kinda unfair to include those.

      • reddig33@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        5 hours ago

        “The researchers compared Waymo’s nationwide crash data with New York City’s for-hire fleet and found the robotaxis had a serious injury or fatal crash rate about 1.5 times higher per mile driven.”

        • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          4 hours ago

          Yes, thank you for quoting exactly what I said??

          You are quoting the serious or fatal injury stats. The overall injury accident rate, though, as quoted from the article: “When all injury-causing crashes were considered, Waymo performed better. Its robotaxis were involved in 67% fewer injury crashes per million miles than New York City’s for-hire vehicles.”

          • BassetHound@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            Fatalities and serious injuries sound like a far more important statistic to optimize for in terms of public safety.