cannedtuna@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agoThis guy’s a real Upstart if you ask melemmy.worldimagemessage-square178fedilinkarrow-up1808
arrow-up1808imageThis guy’s a real Upstart if you ask melemmy.worldcannedtuna@lemmy.world to linuxmemes@lemmy.worldEnglish · 3 months agomessage-square178fedilink
minus-squarenil@piefed.calinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up6·3 months agoI don’t particularly hate systemd, but when they said they are considering incorporating age verification stuff I switched to void.
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up24·edit-23 months agoGood news is that systemd is not incorporating age verification just like they are not incorporating name verification. Both name and birth date are just userdb fields with no verification at all.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up3·3 months agoNo. A database doesn’t have these specific fields by default.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·edit-23 months ago Neither does systemd. They are optional. Fields are optional, but developers of systemd consciously preimplemented those fields. And in a DB that’s not the case.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months agoThis field appeared in LDAP for different reasons, than age control.
minus-squareViceversa@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up2·3 months ago systemd devs successfully rage baited you and a bunch of others Should that be their goal?
minus-squaremholiv@lemmy.worldlinkfedilinkarrow-up4·3 months agoJust as complicit as for name verification. 🤷♀️
I don’t particularly hate systemd, but when they said they are considering incorporating age verification stuff I switched to void.
Good news is that systemd is not incorporating age verification just like they are not incorporating name verification.
Both name and birth date are just userdb fields with no verification at all.
There are complicits.
deleted by creator
No. A database doesn’t have these specific fields by default.
deleted by creator
Fields are optional, but developers of systemd consciously preimplemented those fields.
And in a DB that’s not the case.
This field appeared in LDAP for different reasons, than age control.
deleted by creator
Should that be their goal?
Just as complicit as for name verification. 🤷♀️