Sterling Ball, whose company is the world’s leading maker of premium guitar strings, explains why he made the move to open source and why he’s never looked back since.*

*editorial: Spite!

  • 🇨🇦 tunetardis@piefed.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    6 hours ago

    Ah, so this happened in 2000 and the MS anti-trust ruling came down in 2001. That tracks. It was in the 90s that I really started to distance myself from MS as a small-time dev, and I haven’t looked back since. They were a notoriously evil monopoly that, while lacking any true innovation in their products, was very inventive at coming up with ways to screw over the competition, steal trade secrets, etc. They knew they could get away with it. We all did.

    To give you an example, I had a friend who attended a developer conference and ran a booth where they were trying to sell software involving running mall directory consoles I think it was? Whatever. Well, rumour spread that the vendor Internet was running on a sandboxed subnet managed by the graphics research division at MS, and there was a lot of suspicious activity on that LAN. This was not long after it had become clear that MS had outright stolen disk compression tech from another company (Stacker?) and folded it into their own OS, so indie devs were super paranoid. The busiest booth quickly became that of a new company that had just come up with a security and full disk encryption package. They made a lot of on-the-spot sales just to fellow vendors!

    • kent_eh@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      5 hours ago

      Why does Microsoft always abuse its customers?

      It’s what big pseudo-monopolies do.

      This isn’t a Microsoft specific problem.

  • n7gifmdn@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    5 hours ago

    The idea that if you have 2,000 terminals they all have to have a Web browser, that’s crazy. It just creates distractions.

    Anybody else read this on your work computer?

  • ragebutt@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    60
    ·
    17 hours ago

    “In 2000, the Business Software Alliance conducted a raid and subsequent audit at the San Luis Obispo, Calif.-based company that turned up a few dozen unlicensed copies of programs”

    Later in the article they claim this meant armed marshals showed up at their door to enforce based on a tip from a program that designed to get employees to snitch on their bosses. If that’s true that’s absolutely wild. In what world do you give software companies license to do mandatory audits with severe financial penalties and police support based on heresay that was enticed by the auditor

    • slazer2au@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      41
      ·
      13 hours ago

      In what world do you give software companies license to do mandatory audits with severe financial penalties and police support based on heresay that was enticed by the auditor

      One where One Rich Asshole Called Larry Ellison, otherwise known as Oracle, exists.

      For Java licencing you need to have one license per employee regardless if they use the SDK.

    • Onomatopoeia@lemmy.cafe
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      8 hours ago

      I call BS - I’ve been through dozens of these license audits.

      It simple generates a bill or conversation about alignment.

  • jqubed@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    66
    ·
    18 hours ago

    Article from August 20, 2003

    Did you want to settle?
    Never, never. That’s the difference between the way an employee and an owner thinks. They attacked my family’s name and came into my community and made us look bad. There was never an instance of me wanting to give in. I would have loved to have fought it. But when (the BSA) went to Congress to get their powers, part of what they got is that I automatically have to pay their legal fees from day one. That’s why nobody’s ever challenged them–they can’t afford it. My attorney said it was going to cost our side a quarter million dollars to fight them, and since you’re paying their side, too, figure at least half a million. It’s not worth it. You pay the fine and get on with your business. What most people do is get terrified and pay their license and continue to pay their licenses. And they do that no matter what the license program turns into.

    I wonder if that little poison pill about having to pay the legal fees for the Business Software Alliance from day 1 is still true? I’d also be curious to see a follow-up today for how they’re using FOSS in their business. There are a lot more resources today than there were in 2003!

    • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      28
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I am sure it is still true for business, and they just put it on the books as something they pay for and do not think twice about it. As the rich keep getting richer because of this little buy line in so many companies books I hope more of your US companies do it. I have no idea how they do it here in Canada but I am sure they have something, wish the world would realize what the French police did when they disliked Windows XP and created a Linux distro for themselves instead of suffering.

        • Reannlegge@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          1 hour ago

          I really want governments and businesses in Canada to go FOSS rather than paying big US tech money to harvest our data.

  • Godort@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    39
    ·
    17 hours ago

    This article is over 23 years old. I’d be curious if they’re still entirely open source.

    • altkey (he\him)@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      12 hours ago

      I tried to search around and most results still bring references to the same article. The only way is to contact the company, it’s still in business.

      • ClownStatue@piefed.social
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        9 hours ago

        Article says they’re using Red Hat, so my guess is they’re paying for updates, and probably a support contract. While it’s not exactly the best way to contribute (giving money to IBM), it’s not nothing. Plus IBM does contribute to open source projects beyond RHEL.

        • quill7513@anarchist.nexusOP
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          8
          ·
          edit-2
          55 minutes ago

          i do have to wonder if 23 years later they’re still with RedHat especially since IBM renegotiated many of the contracts when they bought redhat. i’m almost curious enough to email Ernie Ball with the full expectation that they email back “we ain’t telling you shit about our network topology”

          EDIT: Curiosity got the better of me and I sent an email asking

          edit2: they emailed back with an extremely reasonable “we ain’t telling you shit about our network topology”

    • BarneyPiccolo@lemmy.today
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      4 hours ago

      I generally use Ernie Ball strings, for no real reason, other than I’m already familiar with them. Now I have a good reason.

  • resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    17 hours ago

    I tell you what, our hits to eBay went down greatly when not everybody had a Web browser.

    He sounds like fun at parties.