Which approach do you think is better, and why?

  1. FIDO2
  2. HMAC-SHA1
  3. OpenPGP (alternative guide)

Or do you think there is an even better way to use a hardware security token to unlock drives having LUKS full disk encryption?

  • modem_down@thebrainbin.orgOP
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    4 hours ago

    Progress report 1

    • I’m ruling out HMAC-SHA1, because:
    • If using systemd, pick FIDO2:
      • It avoids the flaws of HMAC-SHA1.
      • It’s supported natively in systemd so should be “future-proof”.
      • It’s a more widely-supported standard, than OpenPGP, with more HST vendors to choose from, including cheaper options than NitroKey or Yubikey. This could be useful in environments where each sysadmin (or colleague! or family member!) needs an HST.
      • It’s compatible with QubesOS.
    • Otherwise, OpenPGP:
      • Like FIDO2, it solves the HMAC-SHA1 flaws.
      • However:
        • smartcard-key-luks seems to be unmainted both on GitHub and on GitLab.
        • Unlocking LUKS with OpenPGP isn’t well-documented for non-Debian-based distros.
    • TBD: Clevis/Tang:
      • Permits remote/network-based unlocking.
    • modem_down@thebrainbin.orgOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Thank you for this! That thread is helpful in itself, and also links to other relevant resources - including by Lennart Poettering (controversial guy, but the canonical source on systemd).

  • eldavi@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 day ago

    wouldn’t doing this require that building a ram disk image with the yubikey software included?

    • Kay Ohtie@pawb.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 day ago

      All 3 mechanisms are native to a yubikey, and do not require yubikey-specific software/drivers to function as they use USB standards like FIDO2, keyboard for HMAC, and PIV/CCID for OpenPGP.

      FIDO2 is built-in out-of-the-box, HMAC just requires adding the key to HMAC on slot 1 or 2 (tap vs long-hold key-inputs) using the personalization tool, or using gpg(2) to card-edit for OpenPGP.

      None of these require YK software to operate.

        • modem_down@thebrainbin.orgOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I read them before writing my OP. I’m still not sure what you’re getting at.

          I would be grateful if you could say what you mean, instead of initiating an oblique guessing game.

          • eldavi@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            instead of initiating an oblique guessing game.

            i don’t understand the hostility.

            i asked a question about needing yubikey software in a ramdisk image to enable decryption at boot time and most of the sources you provided don’t mention it at all.

            • floquant@lemmy.dbzer0.com
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              ·
              11 hours ago

              It’s not mentioned because it’s not required, yubikeys in general mostly leverage pre-existing “smartcard” facilities

            • kkremitzki@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              4
              ·
              24 hours ago

              i don’t understand the hostility.

              Bystander observation: you were asked to clarify but essentially refused in a way that took more effort than simply doing so.

              • eldavi@lemmy.ml
                link
                fedilink
                English
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                22 hours ago

                Oic. They didn’t understand that I was asking a question and thought that I was addressing one of their links

                Thanks for helping clarify.