• FriendOfDeSoto@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    52
    ·
    22 hours ago

    I am conflicted here. On the one hand, I agree that subtitles would have been nice. On the other hand, I think folks with hearing disabilities get shut out of other content so much that I don’t think this somewhat solitary case makes it good mildly infuriating material. It’s most likely just an oversight. Much less likely a clever scheme to highlight ableism.

    • drcobaltjedi@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      17 hours ago

      I mean, by US law (back when analog TV was standard) all TV broadcasts had to include closed captions on scanline 23(?) for people with hearing disabilities. it was part of the vertical blanking interval so it didn’t interfere with the regularly visible broadcast. It is good to include subtitles for all dialogue, spoken in the local dialect, in a foreign dialect, and even the various sign languages. That’s isn’t to say that yes, I fully agree that differently abled people should be able to take part in the dialog and should have accommodations where needed.

      Semi related, did you know American sign language is closer to French sign language than it is to British sign language?