• ThirdConsul@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Separate comment because its easier to talk that way:

    EU is not imperialist. They are a function of like global capitalism, which is imperialist, but EU is not imperialist.

    That sentence does not make sense. Its a shade of green but not green makes no fucking sense.

    • Juice@midwest.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      47 minutes ago

      Here’s my reasoning: Capitalism is global, capitalism is imperialist, the national or transnational character of capitalism is geographically dependent. The EU as an entity does not carry out imperialist activity outside of the national/transnational framing. It engages in trade, legal definition/refinement, regulation. It empowers capitalists within the EU to conduct business on a global stage. The EU does not have a military, it does not operate a military that functions imperialistically. It can serve as an organizing force that unites national capital to coordinate national militaries with the aims of empowering national capital to conduct business globally.

      Honestly the more I think through this the harder it is to parse out differences. Most, if not all, EU members are imperialist, but the imperialist part of them is national, not transnational. Honestly I can’t really fault your perspective, and I’d like to develop it more than a “I’m right, you’re wrong” type debate would really allow. I’d be interested in resources that support your position.