• hakase@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    9 hours ago

    For anyone interested, the original comment was:

    “I’ve got enough of the comments that you did make to judge you on the ones you don’t.”

    and I edited it for style and readability.

    I edit my comments like this all the time and will continue to do so as long as it doesn’t change the general meaning/intent. I’m sorry you don’t like it, but then again, I don’t like all of the misandry in your comments and would much rather you edit it out after the fact, so ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

      • hakase@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        edit-2
        9 hours ago

        Misogyny being objectively worse than misandry in a wide variety of ways does not excuse you from adding to the misandry that does exist, in this case demonizing OP for a title that clearly wasn’t misogynist and which could easily have been based on their lived experience.

        We should be lifting each other up, not fighting about who is dragging each other down harder.

        • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          edit-2
          60 minutes ago

          Idk man it seemed kind of misogynist to me. If you make a general unqualified statement based on your lived experience, you are (ambiguously) applying that experience to others based only on their immutable qualities. At least, that would not be an uncommon nor entirely unfounded reading of the statement’s intent.

            • Feathercrown@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              2
              ·
              25 minutes ago

              You have avoided engaging meaningfully with any of my comments and have interpreted them with so many preconceived layers of this conversation that I legitimately do not know what point you are trying to make here.

              • hakase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                14 minutes ago

                My answer is the same: in exactly the same way that calling out perceived misandry can be considered misogyny.

            • velma@sh.itjust.works
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              5
              ·
              8 hours ago

              Oh there was meaning behind it. I’m not going to get a fair shake here with hakase accusing me of misandry so virulently from that single comment though.

              • FreeAZ@sopuli.xyz
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                2
                ·
                7 hours ago

                The other day I saw you accuse a man of being a rapist simply because he had a lot of kids. There is no accusing, you are a misandrist. You are more sexist than the majority of things you call out as sexist.

                You do not see men as human beings, you see them as the enemy. Ironically you don’t see women as human beings either, as even the slightest criticism or mockery of them gets you to calling people misogynists.

                I’ve also seen women call you out on your bullshit, which you would think might get you to do some self reflecting, but I highly doubt you ever will.

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  7 hours ago

                  The other day I saw you accuse a man of being a rapist simply because he had a lot of kids.

                  The picture of the couple that had 18 children back to back with barely any time for the mother to recover from birth?

                  Yeah.

          • hakase@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            7
            ·
            edit-2
            8 hours ago

            The whole “I’m just innocently asking questions” schtick clearly isn’t working in this thread. You’ll get 'em next time though (as long as you post in womensstuff where nobody will call you out on it, of course!)

              • hakase@lemmy.zip
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                4
                ·
                edit-2
                8 hours ago

                Your comments are a very finely polished lens that lends itself well to accurate and detailed projection.

                • velma@sh.itjust.works
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  ·
                  8 hours ago

                  Mhm sure. A person’s social media is a perfect representation of them and you know exactly how I’ll respond to any situation now.

                  • hakase@lemmy.zip
                    link
                    fedilink
                    arrow-up
                    3
                    ·
                    8 hours ago

                    Please prove me wrong. I mean that sincerely. Please establish such a consistent record of not demonizing men in your comments that I no longer feel as though I can confidently ascribe malice to them.