Doesn’t need to be. If they know your home address they can just watch you from the moment you leave the front door. Most surveillance tools in active use cannot identify people. Investigators cross reference other information to verify identity.
Like flock cameras. Which read vehicle license plates and who knows what else they will program it to track.
You would need full coverage for that to work on its own, because as soon as you leave its range there’s ambiguity again about who the person being sensed is. Just disabling the camera probably would help in places where they aren’t dense enough for that.
And your BT headphones, smart watch, airtags, pervert glasses, etc.
Wifi can be used as radar to detect people in real time.
You can detect a person with it, but it’s not sensitive enough to identify the person.
Doesn’t need to be. If they know your home address they can just watch you from the moment you leave the front door. Most surveillance tools in active use cannot identify people. Investigators cross reference other information to verify identity.
Like flock cameras. Which read vehicle license plates and who knows what else they will program it to track.
You would need full coverage for that to work on its own, because as soon as you leave its range there’s ambiguity again about who the person being sensed is. Just disabling the camera probably would help in places where they aren’t dense enough for that.
yet
It only needs to be able to track legs for gait analysis
Great now we need pebbles in our shoes at home to?!
If I had any of those things, I’d also leave them at home.