Death registration data is unavailable or unusable for China due to quality issues. Estimates of mortality by cause should be interpreted with caution. These estimates may be used for priority setting, however, they are not likely to be informative for policy evaluation or comparisons among countries.
We can also review an excerpt from the population introduction from the Chinese Statistical Yearbook, which the study someone cited above cites as their primary data source.
Data in this chapter are prepared by the Department of Population and Employment Statistics of the National Bureau of Statistics. In tables 2-1 to 2-6, figures for 1981 and before are from household registrations; data for the year 1982, 1990, 2000, 2010 and 2020 are the census year estimates; the rest of the data covered in those tables are estimates from the annual national sample survey on population changes and data for selected years have been revised
So in other words, you don’t have any proof, and are using the lack of proof as evidence. That’s not how proof works.
Removed by mod
Yep, all you’re doing is speculation and treating it as proof.
Removed by mod
What discrepancy is there in the data?
Removed by mod
Source: trust me
https://data.who.int/countries/156
We can also review an excerpt from the population introduction from the Chinese Statistical Yearbook, which the study someone cited above cites as their primary data source.
Removed by mod
Because you keep just saying shit and getting mad when you’re not taken at your word that your lack of evidence is actually evidence.
You never gave evidence that China under reports, though.