This is so true tho

  • username123@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    5 hours ago

    Not necessarily against what you said, but I realized you can kinda say that about anything, with some abstraction. There’s always smart people (thankfully), and they’ll often arrive at the same solutions. Roll over, Gauss.

    • boonhet@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Well I think it’s different for scientific discoveries where something is either found or not. Software and other products… There are niche things that may never exist without the author, and there are generic things that would be created in one form or another anyway. Once programming languages were a thing, general purpose high level languages were bound to happen IMO and there are infinite possible languages.

      • username123@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        3 hours ago

        Sure, but what I’m saying is that at a high level of abstraction scientific discoveries are similarly inevitable as well. I don’t think niche creations are a major difference since as you yourself stated “without him we’d just have something else and perhaps it would’ve been a bit later.”. The majority build on previous findings, often many scientists are working towards the same goals, and truth is truth, whether it be found through physical experimentation or fleshing out applied logic.