Solar and wind power is growing worldwide, but so is electricity consumption: as a result, renewables are often only added to the energy mix, rather than replacing fossil fuels.

Reducing energy demand would make net zero more achievable, but it recieves far less attention than decarbonisation efforts. This may be due to a perception that managing energy demand would be politically unpopular, requiring governments to make radical interventions into people’s lifestyles and spending.

Oliver Broad, Senior Research Fellow at University College London, tells Alasdair that such fears are unfounded. His team’s research found that the UK could reduce energy demand by 52% without new tech or overly disruptive societal change, and has worked with policymakers and public focus groups to demonstrate political acceptability.

  • fyzzlefry@retrolemmy.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    0
    ·
    edit-2
    2 days ago

    Did I math that right? 1500kwh/month? That’s a lot isn’t it?

    Or is that total energy, not just what is on the power bill?

    • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      1 day ago

      Did I math that right? 1500kwh/month? That’s a lot isn’t it?

      A gallon of gasoline contains about 37 kWh of energy. A liter would be about 10 kWh.

      It takes about 3.3 kWh of energy to produce one pound of beef (7.3 kWh/kg).

      So most Western countries consume far more energy per capita than 1500 kWh/month. Transportation is a huge part of it. So is agriculture.

      • HerbGrower@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t use petrol and only eat beef a few times a year. Also near half a kg is surely an awful lot to eat.

        • sparkyshocks@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          0
          ·
          11 hours ago

          How much energy does your employer use cooling your office? How much diesel fuel does your government use?

          The point is taking an entire country’s energy usage, including for agricultural, industrial, commercial, government, and military use, and divide it by the number of people in that country. You might be better than most, but the goal itself includes trying to reduce the non-residential, non-consumer uses as well.

    • Chaf@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      0
      ·
      2 days ago

      Yep. I mean… the wikipedia article is right there, linked in the comment… according to it, Switzerland had a primary energy consumption of 5.1 kW per person in 2008 and reached 4 kW per person in 2020. So still quite some way to go