• hakunawazo@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    edit-2
    6 hours ago

    That’s why I can’t take film/game censorship serious. The game didn’t change, just the stupid rules somehow. Similar to violence in old games like Doom where the BPjM changed their mind justified by the shitty graphics and sound compared to modern standards.
    Additionally the whole “killergame” debate relating first person shooter games by “experts” and politicians was so stupid.

    • Katana314@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      6 hours ago

      I actually don’t know if the rules changed, did they? It was just that the publishers of the time weren’t ambitious enough to be sure they could prove in court that “These uses of swastikas are for the means of depicting Nazis in a negative light”. Much easier to just sidestep the analysis.

      • hakunawazo@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        5 hours ago

        I haven’t looked further, if it is the case here, but social adequacy is a thing regarding evaluation of videogames since a few years: https://usk.de/usk-beruecksichtigt-bei-altersfreigabe-von-spielen-kuenftig-sozialadaequanz/
        Sure, nobody should allow a game where nazi culture will be praised. But if they are allowed as bad guys, e.g. in Indiana Jones movies, it should also be allowed here.
        Beside that, the Doom example and their argumentation in my last post is a real joke (and in my opinion symptomatic for the whole censoring arbitrariness).