• Otter@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    It does sound like a genuine mistake as opposed to something sneaky.

    I’m far from an expert on open source best practices, and I also wouldn’t have known the difference between taking code with a .patch file vs taking code with copy and paste. I probably would have attributed it in some other way, but I’m a bit anxious that way and tend to go even further and overdo things. It takes me forever to publish posts and website updates out for our instance.

    Why do developers of open source software have to make shit so difficult?

    I think that’s the nature of forks of projects. When someone makes a fork, there is usually some kind of tension between the two developers and so something that feels small to outsiders might feel more significant to those involved.

    • 𝙈𝙞𝙖@quokk.au
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      17 minutes ago

      When you have the context he left out, it sounds less like a genuine mistake and more like deliberate malice. He intentionally tried to take the code instead of simply cherry-picking a commit and keeping attribution, something I have no issue doing.

      image