TotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 天前rule partylemmy.blahaj.zoneimagemessage-square40fedilinkarrow-up1412
arrow-up1412imagerule partylemmy.blahaj.zoneTotallynotJessica@lemmy.blahaj.zoneM to 196@lemmy.blahaj.zoneEnglish · 3 天前message-square40fedilink
minus-squareSlein4273@feddit.orglinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·3 天前I think i need someone to explain me the joke, please
minus-squareFreddiesLantern@leminal.spacelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up58·3 天前I think the joke is that traditionally (or heteronormatively speaking) women get in for free and men have to pay. “Because women attract men. Not so much visa versa.” (That’s the college fratboy logic, not mine tbc). Non binaries don’t even enter that conversation. In this post the priorities are reversed.
minus-squaresem@piefed.blahaj.zonelinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up18·3 天前Is this why there is nobody at the party in the picture though? 🤔
minus-squareDragonTypeWyvern@midwest.sociallinkfedilinkEnglisharrow-up8·edit-23 天前It’s advertising the party… I mean, it’s obviously a joke (probably) but the conceit is that it’s an advertisement ahead of time.
I think i need someone to explain me the joke, please
I think the joke is that traditionally (or heteronormatively speaking) women get in for free and men have to pay. “Because women attract men. Not so much visa versa.” (That’s the college fratboy logic, not mine tbc).
Non binaries don’t even enter that conversation.
In this post the priorities are reversed.
Is this why there is nobody at the party in the picture though? 🤔
It’s advertising the party… I mean, it’s obviously a joke (probably) but the conceit is that it’s an advertisement ahead of time.