• culprit@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    230
    ·
    edit-2
    20 hours ago

    Jury Nullification is like the secret code of the US justice system.That’s why most of the people that work for the system absolutely despised the whole idea.

    • Uriel238 [all pronouns]@lemmy.blahaj.zone
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      22
      ·
      13 hours ago

      Though this happened with the grand jury, which only needs a majority vote (sometimes a supermajority). It means a lot of people chose to nullify or didn’t trust the prosecution to give a fair trial.

    • Jake Farm@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      edit-2
      4 hours ago

      The us justice system is already fucked up and makes a joke of the term justice.

      • NewNewAugustEast@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        4 hours ago

        This is really true. Pick a blog, video, or what ever lawyer you want making comment on the state of the federal justice system right now. It’s a mess and a shit show.

        • nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          2 hours ago

          The 5-4 and Strict Scrutiny podcasts are fucking infuriating to listen to. The hypocrisy and self contradiction in Supreme Court and some circuit court decisions is insane.

      • greyscale@lemmy.grey.ooo
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        7 hours ago

        I mean, if it wasn’t packaged up in the American flag and pax americana, your nations actions would be that of clearly terrorist nation.

        I don’t expect the taliban to have a working legal/justice system either.

      • bedwyr@piefed.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        19
        ·
        18 hours ago

        Common Law is better than codified law. That’s the only reason we have juries and don’t just let judges decide the fate of the accused. Can you imagine, in this country, judges the sole decider of your case?

        The reason that the UK and US have had such cuntish law enforcement is not because of english common law. It should be noted the UK cancelled some of common law’s basic tenants, like the right to a jury trial, not only afforded to indictable offenses, any crime with less than 3 years imprisonment is decided by their famously haughty aristocratic judges now.

        • Zagorath@quokk.au
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Jury vs judge trial is a separate axis from common law vs civil law. You can have common law (where decisions of higher courts are deemed binding on lower courts) even if lower courts are all judge-only trials. You can have trials decided by a jury where every decision made by a judge is ultimately answerable only to written statute, with prior judicial judgments being at best persuasive.

          • bedwyr@piefed.ca
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            11
            ·
            17 hours ago

            Yeah, first the Tories maybe 5-7 years back or so cancelled juries for crimes with less than 1 year imprisonment, then Starmer’s labour party just upped it to all crimes less than 3 years.

            In the late 19th century they also passed a law where if they thought jury tampering was going to happen they could just do it with a judge, idk how often they have used it though.

      • ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        16
        ·
        edit-2
        18 hours ago

        They would have to get rid of juries altogether.

        Given that our current legal system was created as a direct reaction to star chambers and baked into the constitution, they have an uphill climb, at the least.

        • AmyAye@nord.pub
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          5
          ·
          6 hours ago

          They don’t care about the constitution man.

          Trump will do an executive order, it’ll get tonthe Supreme.Cpurt, and they will just kneelnon it for “time to think about it.” And that will be it, its “the law” now.

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            2 hours ago

            The Supreme Court isn’t going to curb its own power for Trump. Even with three of them permanently hanging off his dick, they’ve shut down literally everything he’s done that could affect them personally.

          • arrow74@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            ·
            edit-2
            3 hours ago

            Why do people keep pretending the Supreme Court always agrees with Trump. They’ve struck him down often and seem to be taking a very strict constitutionalist view. Most recent example would be the whole birthright citizenship ruling.

            Obviously this court is terrible for many reasons, they gutted the voting rights act and ended Roe. But they’re not getting rid of juries their record is clear there

      • Tollana1234567@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        13 hours ago

        they will give him a secret trial, or disappear to one of thier concentration camps in the south, which would mostly be texas, and the msms will never ever report on a citizen getting detained, at least not a white one.