Bit of an uphill fight with captchas everywhere. Do people here conduct all online activity over VPN whenever possible? Only for the sensitive stuff? Or perhaps the inverse because the bank already knows you? Maybe when travelling or getting around region blocking? Something else?

The one provided by my work aside, I realized that I don’t have any consistent rules around using VPN. Except sometimes, you know, when downloading ISO’s for my favorite distos.

  • ohshit604@lemmy.halstead.host
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    edit-2
    13 minutes ago

    Phone > WireGuard Tunnel to my House = Reap the benefits of my PiHole and other hosted services > WireGuard Tunnel to ProtonVPN endpoint = Reap the benefits of appearing outside my country

    Essentially created my own multi-hop VPN, which I use 24/7 outside of my home-network.

  • Nighed@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    1 hour ago

    My phone almost always has a Vpn on to my home network (gets me pi-hole goodness)

    Other than that, very occasionally use the Firefox built in one + the one for my “Linux iso” torrenting container, that’s not on most of the time though.

  • TrackinDaKraken@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I never have. Don’t know how to do it (I know it’s not hard). The only use I occasionally have is blocked media, but I just don’t watch whatever it is. It’s not that important to me.

    What’s important to me is blocking ads, which I do as much as possible. The way I see it, the main point of them tracking me is to serve me ads, so I break the chain at the ads.

    If I want privacy, I use Tor. Everything else seems like spitting into the wind.

    • Zerush@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      46 minutes ago

      I also think, ad/trackerblocker, Portmaster and common sense in what you public on the web is mostly enough (How much claims of the lack of privacy I saw in Facebook through the years…)

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    2 hours ago

    mostly against geoblocking when I want to watch public TV channels from while I’m not in the “right” country, e.g. when I want to watch PBS outside of the US, Arte outside of Europe (even though I dont think they block anymore), FranceTV outside of France, Ray out of Italy, etc.

    Sometimes also for blocked content, e.g. PirateBay in France or AnnaArchive in Belgium but typically for these public proxies are enough.

    Ah I also use self-hosted VPN for my own self-hosted services when I’m on the move but it is typically very small traffic.

    FWIW I’m not using a large commercial ISP, so trusting my ISP is a big part of my behavior.

  • Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    3 hours ago

    At home never, only sometimes a proxy (CyberGhost extension, Chrome, Firefox) in case of country restrictions. In my phone no need, I don’t use public WiFi, it’s enough with InVizible Pro. Apart the Portmaster app on desktop (Windows, Linux)

    • ohshit604@lemmy.halstead.host
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      edit-2
      4 minutes ago

      CyberGhost extension

      Suggest digging into CyberGhost and their history and association with Kape Technologies.

      https://windscribe.com/blog/what-is-kape-technologies/

      Kape’s Sketchy Beginnings

      Let’s just take a brief moment to look at the origins of Kape. It wasn’t always known by this name, the original company was called Crossrider.

      Crossrider dealt in Malware (they called it “ad injection”), and their specialty was building a platform that allowed mobile app developers to easily inject ads into their software or web application. They were so good at it, they caught the attention of Google’s security research team who were incredibly alarmed by what they had found: an entire ecosystem of thousands of companies, broken down into various segments (Software, Distribution, Injection, and Ads).

      Crossrider’s main purpose was to function as a distributor, and they were incredibly effective at this. They used their network to drive as many installs as possible, all while collecting a commission for each install of the ad injection software. For those curious about this ecosystem, an archived version of Google’s Security Blog can be found here.

      Rebranding as Kape Technologies

      Due to the increasing negative attention their antics were causing, the company underwent a massive rebranding and emerged as Kape Technologies.

      Nowadays, Kape Technologies is a conglomerate of multiple “privacy-first” software companies, including Express VPN. Express is not their only play in the VPN space though: they’ve also acquired a few larger-scale VPN operations over the past few years. Their first VPN acquisition was Cyberghost for €9.1M back in 2017, followed by Private Internet Access for $127M and Zenmate for €4.8M in 2018. Then came the Express VPN whale in 2021 for $936M, giving Kape a massive foothold in the VPN marketplace.

      If Kape VPNs are known for anything, it’s being kinda sketchy. Since we’ve already covered Express in a previous article, the focus will be on the other three lesser-known VPNs that are part of the Kape Corporate Umbrella

      Kape Acquires Cyberghost

      Cyberghost was the first VPN that Kape acquired, back when they were still called Crossrider. Cyberghost was founded in 2011 by German entrepreneur Robert Knapp, who moved to Bucharest with $100,000 in seed capital ready to exploit the cheaper labor market in Romania. Robert’s own bio on the Cyberghost website claims that he’s passionate about building a privacy-preserving product, yet he had no problem cashing out for almost $10 Million to a company run by ex-Israeli spies and insider-trading billionaires. The irony is apparently lost in translation I suppose.

      There’s also an issue with vulnerabilities. In 2023, professional pen testers exposed a vulnerability in the Cyberghost VPN client that could lead to system compromise, yet they had an incredibly difficult time getting any sort of response from the Kape security team (who quickly and quietly patched the issue).

  • Random_Character_A@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    5 hours ago

    In a way always.

    Whole family is connected to home network and home network has filters and blockers in the outgoing router.

    Additionally home security system doesn’t have to keep connections open outside or have ports forwarded.

    Outgoing router however does not have VPN set, so home network IP is visible. This is to keep everything operational and CAPTHCA from annoying users.

    • curious_dolphin@slrpnk.net
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      4 hours ago

      Whole family is connected to home network and home network has filters and blockers in the outgoing router.

      Aside from the obvious benefit of blocking advertising traffic for all devices on your home network, does this strategy also improve your ability to blend in by eliminating the need for an ad blocking browser extension such as ubo?

  • thanksforallthefish@literature.cafe
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    10 hours ago

    Permanently on. Anything I can’t access without it I generally find an alternate with very few exceptions. I have a quarantine virtual machine I use for the couple of websites that are worth making an exception for.

  • artyom@piefed.social
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    47
    ·
    16 hours ago

    Pretty much always. If someone blocks my VPN, I just don’t go there or don’t use that. Sucks but it is what it is. I’m just not willing to enter your site bareback.