#Tapatalk was a dominant app in the pre-social media days when discussions took place on all different forums and message board sites across the internet, not centralized platforms like today. Tapatalk provided a centralized way to subscribe to all those discussions on different servers, post and comment freely, without logging into each forum site directly.

Since then #Reddit became the centralized and dominant place to engage around niche topics, killing that diverse ecosystem of forums. I’d like to see the #Fediverse become and equivalent “central” location for finding and engaging with niche topics while remaining decentralized by its nature.

We still have lots of forums running on open source #Discourse software, but we don’t have an easy way to connect and engage all those communities back into #Lemmy, #ActivityPub, and the #Fediverse to make them findable with the same ease Reddit provides.

What’s the best way to unify the #Fediverse with the existing forum communities that exist outside the platform web?

  • Pamasich@kbin.earth
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    1 day ago

    We still have lots of forums running on open source #Discourse software, but we don’t have an easy way to connect and engage all those communities back into #Lemmy, #ActivityPub, and the #Fediverse to make them findable with the same ease Reddit provides.

    Might be a stupid question, but have you tried the Discourse Activitypub plugin? Discourse is part of the threadiverse.

    • tedcurran@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      1 day ago

      Not a stupid question, but I should clarify that I’m approaching this as a reader, not an admin. I’m trying to find a reading solution that encompasses forums running on Discourse, NodeBB, and whatever else older platforms might still have thriving communities around topics I’m interested in.

      I found the DiscourseHub app that lets you browse and subscribe to a wide cross section of communities powered by Discourse, but no NodeBB or others. The solution I’m envisioning would be like that but agnostic of platforms.

  • Vicinus@piefed.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    10
    ·
    2 days ago

    Maybe check out NodeBB. My recollection is that it’s a federated server software for forums that can interface with at least Mastodon and Piefed (probably Lemmy and Mbin too).

    I believe I’ve seen some content from a forum in the past, but it’s tough to tell, as I think they just show up the same as any other threadiverse instance (a post in a community on an instance).

    I’m not sure how you’d search for them though…

    • ozoned@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      NodeBB is the answer. NodeBB bridges the Fediverse and Threadiverse. It allows conversations from all sides.

      I will state though that this is the goal of the Fediverse. It shouldn’t matter which software you use. You should still be able to engage in a conversation no matter where you are. And we’re getting there. :)

  • kbal@fedia.io
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    2 days ago

    Neat. But it’s not pre social media. Social media has been around since the 1980s.

    The fediverse has become the central hub for it all due to its nature. Any forums or whatever which want to join in and be a part of it are free to do so. It could perhaps be made easier, but that depends on the technical details of the protocols involved which are still hard to understand.

    • tedcurran@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Neat. But it’s not pre social media. Social media has been around since the 1980s.

      That’s why I alternately call it the “platform web” in which social media stopped running on open and interoperable protocols and started being walled gardens on commercial platforms.

      And to your other point - it shouldn’t be solely up to forum admins to opt-in to the Fediverse, end users should be able to subscribe to the forums they belong to with Fedi-powered tools.

      The Fediverse could and should be the place where all those things can converge but I’m pointing out that it currently is failing to be that.

    • HubertManne@piefed.social
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      2 days ago

      I used to love the newsgroups and what I liked about reddit was its similarity to it in some ways. this is even more so because rec, alt, etc where in some ways like instances.

  • répa@fedinsfw.app
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    2 days ago

    I think of how people on the fediverse have mixed feelings about drawing in people from corporate social media:

    Do those forums want to be federated?

    I remember there was a retro instance a short while back that managed to reconfigure their frontend to look like a typical forum site.

    If a forum community wanted, they could probably port (most of) their forum history to something like that.

    • tedcurran@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      1 day ago

      Real interoperability should allow the publisher (them) to set the level of access (public/private) to their content AND THEN the end user (you and me) to choose the kind of client experience we use to consume that content so we can customize the user experience to our needs. That’s how email and websites work. If a forum software exposed its posts and comments to the open web or RSS (or even just to logged in users), anyone should be able to open that content with the browser or app of their choice. Commercial social platforms have distorted this very basic relationship between publishers and users but we can never forget that is the way it should be.