Of all the places “AI” absolutely does not belong, in the hands of university students and professors has to be close to the top of the list. What would a place that is supposed to be a center of human learning and founding critical thinking skills need with a product explicitly advertising itself as a shortcut to doing the work and “thinking critically” for you?
Butlerian jihad now please
I cant wait to see some student claim that their “AI Agent” attended all their classes and did all their assignments for them, so they want their diploma from the college
Never understood.
-
“Kids, you’ll get penalized if you use AI for any of your school work. We have tools to check for that. That’s cheating.”
-
“Kids, here’s a free subscription to AI. Go nuts.”
-
If it came on a physical disc, you could use it as a frisbee. Or a drink coaster.
The era when companies sent out physical floppies, which could actually be usefully reused if you didn’t care about the content on them, was a lot better than the physical CD era.
Would have been dope if all those AOL CDs could have been re-written. I’d have definitely used them for free storage.
If it weren’t for the fact that the Internet is cheaper and readers aren’t as universally-deployed as they were wirh floppies, SD cards being mailed could have been kinda neat.
I guess better ChatGPT than that child undress app known as Grok.
Honesly, claude would have been a much better choice - at least it would be useful for the engineers.
Don’t let them benchmarks lie to you, chatGPT fumbles just about everything you trow at it.
Cmon! Become dependent on a subscription to “thinking”. You can think more if you pay more!
