• balsoft@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      edit-2
      5 hours ago

      In my experience, with the amount of mistakes similar to the one in the OP, I strongly suspect that language is somehow unbelievably close (semantically) to English then.

      I decided to quickly experiment with two languages I somewhat know, and got 3/3 incorrect translations consistent with English as intermediary:

      • Russian ширинка (fly, meaning “zipper on your trousers”) -> Georgian ფრენა (to fly, as in “flight”) - completely incorrect translation, consistent with English as intermediary
      • Russian парковаться (to park, as in “park your car”) -> Georgian პარკი (park, meaning “green space with trees”) - completely incorrect translation, consistent with English as intermediary
      • Russia лежать (to lie, as in “lie on your back”) -> Georgian ტყუილი (lie, as meaning “untruth”) - completely incorrect translation, consistent with English as intermediary

      It makes exactly the same mistakes if you translate from Russian to Spanish and French too.

      I don’t know if there are many other languages where “zipper on your trousers” and “flight”, “park your car” and “green space with trees”, “lie on your back” and “untruth” would all be pairwise the exact same word. I strongly suspect not, or at least it would be a language really close to English.

    • dreugeworst@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 hours ago

      you’d think they would use embeddings nowadays instead, with all the llm hype going on

    • glimse@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      6 hours ago

      They don’t. OP just bulk reposts other people’s complaints. Talk about mildlyinfuriating

    • Starya67@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      edit-2
      9 hours ago

      You notice it when you look at international instructions on packets of food. The non-English texts have a distinct English vibe even when the product is, say, French or German.

      • sfxrlz@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        7 hours ago

        Or Microsoft documentation pages which are all sloppily translated by ai without proofreading

  • JelleWho@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    7
    ·
    11 hours ago

    For German Dutch is does seem to do it directly. But I think it mostly is because a person has put in the effort for it.

  • balsoft@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 hours ago

    Yeah, in my experience it absolutely does translate everything via English. If you need to translate from Ukranian directly to other languages, ironically Yandex Translate is probably your best bet. It’s worse at Russian <-> English and Ukranian <-> English but much better at direct pairs between other languages.

    • gegil@sopuli.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      11 hours ago

      Are they? I know that its been that way years ago, but now with ai technology, it should be able to translate text not just by the word definition, but also context and conceptual meaning. At lest it is supposed to work this way if they used ai for actually useful stuff and not another slop generator.

      • balsoft@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        9
        ·
        edit-2
        10 hours ago

        it should be able to translate text not just by the word definition, but also context and conceptual meaning.

        It has been doing that at least since 2016, and it’s using LLM-adjacent tech (transformer + RNN) since 2020. The problem is that it still seems to be doing things via English, which is especially problematic for single words with no context. In this example, “зачиняти” means “to close”. Google translates it to English as simply “close”, which loses the context of which meaning or even part of speech it is. Google then translates it to Japanese, but since the context is lost it assumes that “close” means “near” rather than “block an opening” and translates it as “chikai”.

        (actually, Yandex Translate fucks this up as well and translates “зачиняти” as “黙れ” (shut up), which is somehow worse)

          • Taldan@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            5 hours ago

            It translated correctly to 閉める

            I have generally found it very good for Japanese, but I’ve only done Japanese <-> English pairing